SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to PowerDMARC

Other Email security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PowerDMARC does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 34 that differ from PowerDMARC on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PowerDMARC has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PowerDMARC does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PowerDMARC does notPowerDMARC publishes, and they do not
KnowBe4knowbe4.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Red Siftredsift.com 83/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Hoxhunthoxhunt.com 74/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Abnormalabnormalsecurity.com 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
dmarciandmarcian.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Pauboxpaubox.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Valimailvalimail.com 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Retarusretarus.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Darktracedarktrace.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
MailRoutemailroute.net 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hornetsecurityhornetsecurity.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Cofensecofense.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.