Transparency alternatives to Euna Solutions
Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Euna Solutions. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 62 that differ from Euna Solutions on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Euna Solutions has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Euna Solutions” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Euna Solutions | Found at Euna Solutions, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accelaaccela.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accela | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Submittablesubmittable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Submittable | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Fluxxfluxx.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxx | 43/100 | 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Foundantfoundant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foundant | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Rekorrekor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rekor | 39/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Axonaxon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axon | 35/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| OpenGovopengov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenGov | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| ProudCityproudcity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProudCity | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Granicusgranicus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Granicus | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kahuakahua.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kahua | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Mark43mark43.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mark43 | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Polcopolco.usSee also Transparency alternatives to Polco | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.