Transparency alternatives to Namely
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Namely. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 73 that differ from Namely on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Namely has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Namely” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Namely | Found at Namely, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Oyster | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Sloneeksloneek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sloneek | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ADPadp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ADP | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employment Hero | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Charlie HRcharliehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Charlie HR | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Lanolano.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Lano | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Humaanshumaans.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Humaans | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| NEOGOVneogov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NEOGOV | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| EmployeeConnectemployeeconnect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EmployeeConnect | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.