Transparency alternatives to Oyster
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Oyster. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 73 that differ from Oyster on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Oyster has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Oyster” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Oyster | Found at Oyster, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employment Hero | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Namelynamely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Namely | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Justworksjustworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Justworks | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 70/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Multiplierusemultiplier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multiplier | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Peblhellopebl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pebl | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| ADPadp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ADP | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Humaanshumaans.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Humaans | 35/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Remoteremote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Remote | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Ripplingrippling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rippling | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.