Transparency alternatives to Lano
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lano. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 71 that differ from Lano on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lano has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Lano” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Lano | Found at Lano, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Oyster | 74/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Sloneeksloneek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sloneek | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Employment Hero | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Namelynamely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Namely | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Remoteremote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Remote | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Peblhellopebl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pebl | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Humaanshumaans.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Humaans | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Multiplierusemultiplier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multiplier | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Charlie HRcharliehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Charlie HR | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.