Transparency alternatives to EmployeeConnect
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that EmployeeConnect does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 66 that differ from EmployeeConnect on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
EmployeeConnect has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and EmployeeConnect does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and EmployeeConnect does not | EmployeeConnect publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.com | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Namelynamely.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.com | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Employment Heroemploymenthero.com | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Multiplierusemultiplier.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Deeldeel.com | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lanolano.io | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Peblhellopebl.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Remoteremote.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Youmanageyoumanage.co.uk | 26/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Sesame HRsesamehr.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.