SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PagerTree

Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at PagerTree. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from PagerTree on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PagerTree has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at PagerTree” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PagerTreeFound at PagerTree, not found there
incident.ioincident.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to incident.io 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Hyperpinghyperping.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperping 74/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 nothing Compare
Moogsoftmoogsoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moogsoft 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
OhDearohdear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to OhDear 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Resolveresolve.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Resolve 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
BigPandabigpanda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to BigPanda 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Rootlyrootly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rootly 48/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Uptime.comuptime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptime.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
PagerDutypagerduty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PagerDuty 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Instatusinstatus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instatus 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Causelycausely.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Causely 35/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
All Quietallquiet.appSee also Transparency alternatives to All Quiet 48/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.