SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to PagerTree

Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PagerTree does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from PagerTree on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PagerTree has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PagerTree does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PagerTree does notPagerTree publishes, and they do not
incident.ioincident.io 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
ilertilert.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Moogsoftmoogsoft.com 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
BigPandabigpanda.io 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
PagerDutypagerduty.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Causelycausely.ai 48/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Jelijeli.io 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
All Quietallquiet.app 48/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare
AlertOpsalertops.com 43/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Everbridgeeverbridge.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Public pricing Compare
FireHydrantfirehydrant.com 39/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
xMattersxmatters.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.