SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Paligo

Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Paligo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Paligo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Paligo has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Paligo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Paligo does notPaligo publishes, and they do not
Orbusorbussoftware.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Electricelectric.ai 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Zlurizluri.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Zylozylo.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Bizzdesignbizzdesign.com 38/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Cledaracledara.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Reftabreftab.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Sastrifysastrify.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Lansweeperlansweeper.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Aagonaagon.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Ardoqardoq.com 48/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare
Planviewplanview.com 39/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.