SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Sastrify

Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sastrify. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Sastrify on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sastrify has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Sastrify” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SastrifyFound at Sastrify, not found there
Setylsetyl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Setyl 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ardoqardoq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ardoq 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Paligopaligo.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Paligo 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Planviewplanview.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planview 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Zlurizluri.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zluri 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
Toriitoriihq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Torii 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Electricelectric.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Electric 48/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Lansweeperlansweeper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lansweeper 39/100 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Orbusorbussoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orbus 39/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Zylozylo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zylo 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Bizzdesignbizzdesign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzdesign 38/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
IT Portalitportal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IT Portal 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.