SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Lansweeper

Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Lansweeper does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Lansweeper on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Lansweeper has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Lansweeper does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Lansweeper does notLansweeper publishes, and they do not
Planviewplanview.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Toriitoriihq.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Ardoqardoq.com 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Bizzdesignbizzdesign.com 38/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
EZOfficeInventoryezo.io 26/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Electricelectric.ai 48/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Avolutionavolutionsoftware.com 39/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Cledaracledara.com 39/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Orbusorbussoftware.com 39/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Zylozylo.com 39/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Device42device42.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
LeanIXleanix.net 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.