Transparency alternatives to Planview
Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Planview. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Planview on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Planview has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Planview” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Planview | Found at Planview, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setylsetyl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Setyl | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Electricelectric.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Electric | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Paligopaligo.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Paligo | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cledaracledara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cledara | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Orbusorbussoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orbus | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Reftabreftab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reftab | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bizzdesignbizzdesign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzdesign | 38/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Sastrifysastrify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sastrify | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Timlytimly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timly | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Verticevertice.oneSee also Transparency alternatives to Vertice | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Ardoqardoq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ardoq | 52/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Zlurizluri.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zluri | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.