SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Zylo

Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Zylo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Zylo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Zylo has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Zylo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Zylo does notZylo publishes, and they do not
Ardoqardoq.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Planviewplanview.com 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Toriitoriihq.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Electricelectric.ai 48/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Lansweeperlansweeper.com 43/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Avolutionavolutionsoftware.com 39/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Cledaracledara.com 39/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Orbusorbussoftware.com 39/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Bizzdesignbizzdesign.com 38/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Sastrifysastrify.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
EZOfficeInventoryezo.io 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Josysjosys.com 26/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.