Transparency alternatives to Electric
Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Electric. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Electric on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Electric has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Electric” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Electric | Found at Electric, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setylsetyl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Setyl | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Paligopaligo.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Paligo | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Ardoqardoq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ardoq | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Planviewplanview.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planview | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Toriitoriihq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Torii | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| IT Portalitportal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IT Portal | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Zlurizluri.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zluri | 48/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Lansweeperlansweeper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lansweeper | 39/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Orbusorbussoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orbus | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Bizzdesignbizzdesign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzdesign | 38/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Verticevertice.oneSee also Transparency alternatives to Vertice | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| LeanIXleanix.netSee also Transparency alternatives to LeanIX | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.