Transparency alternatives to Setyl
Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Setyl. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Setyl on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Setyl has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Setyl” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Setyl | Found at Setyl, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orbusorbussoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orbus | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Electricelectric.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Electric | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Zlurizluri.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zluri | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Zylozylo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zylo | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Bizzdesignbizzdesign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzdesign | 38/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Planviewplanview.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planview | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Cledaracledara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cledara | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Lansweeperlansweeper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lansweeper | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Reftabreftab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reftab | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Sastrifysastrify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sastrify | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Aagonaagon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aagon | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| EZOfficeInventoryezo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to EZOfficeInventory | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.