SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Atomicwork

Other IT service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Atomicwork does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Atomicwork on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Atomicwork has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Atomicwork does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Atomicwork does notAtomicwork publishes, and they do not
Atlassianatlassian.com 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Rezolverezolve.ai 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 Subprocessor list Compare
HaloITSMhaloitsm.com 60/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Ivantiivanti.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
TOPdesktopdesk.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Siitsiit.io 50/100 1 Status page with history 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Vivantiovivantio.com 43/100 1 Status page with history 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Xurrentxurrent.com 42/100 1 Status page with history 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
ManageEnginemanageengine.com 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
OTRSotrs.com 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Alloy Softwarealloysoftware.com 30/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
EasyVistaeasyvista.com 17/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.