Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Nethealth Lab. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Nethealth Lab on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Nethealth Lab has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Nethealth Lab” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Nethealth Lab | Found at Nethealth Lab, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Ilisilis.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Ilis | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| Nexus Labnexus-ag.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexus Lab | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| Opus Lsysmex.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Opus L | 9/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Sciformationsciformation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sciformation | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| Wilabwilab.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Wilab | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.