SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Quartzy

Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Quartzy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Quartzy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Quartzy has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Quartzy” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at QuartzyFound at Quartzy, not found there
Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab 52/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey 48/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SciSurescisure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SciSure 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.