Alternatives to Opus L
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Opus L does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 22 that differ from Opus L on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Opus L has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Opus L does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Opus L does not | Opus L publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.com | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.net | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.com | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Dornerdorner.de | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Starlimsstarlims.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Labsteplabstep.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Novopathnovopath.com | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cenevotitian.co.uk | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.