Transparency alternatives to Ilis
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ilis. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Ilis on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ilis has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ilis” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ilis | Found at Ilis, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Labgurulabguru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labguru | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.