Transparency alternatives to Benchling
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Benchling. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Benchling on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Benchling has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Benchling” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Benchling | Found at Benchling, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Lab Threadlabthread.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lab Thread | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| LabCuplabcup.netSee also Transparency alternatives to LabCup | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Ilisilis.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Ilis | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.