SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Genemod

Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Genemod. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Genemod on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Genemod has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Genemod” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at GenemodFound at Genemod, not found there
Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab 52/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
SciSurescisure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SciSure 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Novopathnovopath.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novopath 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Sapio Sciencessapiosciences.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sapio Sciences 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.