Transparency alternatives to IGOR
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at IGOR. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 46 that differ from IGOR on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
IGOR has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at IGOR” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at IGOR | Found at IGOR, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Labgurulabguru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labguru | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SciSurescisure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SciSure | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Xavoxavo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xavo | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.