Transparency alternatives to ECI Solutions
Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ECI Solutions. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from ECI Solutions on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ECI Solutions has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at ECI Solutions” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ECI Solutions | Found at ECI Solutions, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuliptulip.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Tulip | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Dozukidozuki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dozuki | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ams Erpams-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ams Erp | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Scytec DataXchangescytec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scytec DataXchange | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Evoconevocon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evocon | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Forcam Enisco | 26/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Reverreverscore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rever | 26/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Simussimus-systems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simus | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Asset Scienceassetscience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset Science | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Step Aheadstepahead.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Step Ahead | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Digital Factorydigitalfactory3d.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Digital Factory | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Abasabas-erp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abas | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.