SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Peakboard

Other Manufacturing execution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Peakboard does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Peakboard on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Peakboard has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Peakboard does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Peakboard does notPeakboard publishes, and they do not
Ams Erpams-erp.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Abasabas-erp.com 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
ECI Solutionsecisolutions.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Forcam Eniscoforcam-enisco.net 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Step Aheadstepahead.de 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Worximityworximity.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Evoconevocon.com 26/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Machinemetricsmachinemetrics.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Aveva MESaveva.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Critical Manufacturingcriticalmanufacturing.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Inforinfor.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
MPDVmpdv.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.