SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Energage

Other Performance management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Energage. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Energage on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Energage has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Energage” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at EnergageFound at Energage, not found there
Betterworksbetterworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betterworks 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Leapsomeleapsome.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapsome 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Perdooperdoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Perdoo 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Latticelattice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lattice 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
PerformYardperformyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PerformYard 65/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Profit.coprofit.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Profit.co 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Culture Ampcultureamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Culture Amp 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Nectarnectarhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nectar 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
WorkBoardworkboard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WorkBoard 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
15Five15five.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 15Five 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Kudoskudos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kudos 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Small Improvementssmall-improvements.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Small Improvements 43/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.