Transparency alternatives to senhasegura
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at senhasegura. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from senhasegura on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
senhasegura has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at senhasegura” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at senhasegura | Found at senhasegura, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dopplerdoppler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doppler | 83/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Tailscaletailscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tailscale | 70/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Delinea | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| C1c1.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to C1 | 61/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| SailPointsailpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SailPoint | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to StrongDM | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Twingatetwingate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twingate | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GitGuardian | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Devolutions | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infisical | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| NordLayernordlayer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NordLayer | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Akeyless | 43/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.