Alternatives to Silverfort
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Silverfort does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Silverfort on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Silverfort has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Silverfort does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Silverfort does not | Silverfort publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 78/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| ConductorOneconductorone.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.com | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Indentindent.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| NordLayernordlayer.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.net | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.io | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Netwrixnetwrix.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Oleriaoleria.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.