Alternatives to Basecamp
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Basecamp does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Basecamp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Basecamp has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Basecamp does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Basecamp does not | Basecamp publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.com | 91/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.com | 91/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Linearlinear.app | 80/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Miromiro.com | 74/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| monday.commonday.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| OpenProjectopenproject.org | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.com | 52/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Niftyniftypm.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| ClickUpclickup.com | 56/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Trellotrello.com | 55/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Asanaasana.com | 48/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.