Transparency alternatives to Breeze
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Breeze. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 76 that differ from Breeze on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Breeze has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Breeze” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Breeze | Found at Breeze, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airtable | 91/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartsheet | 91/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| monday.commonday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to monday.com | 74/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Miromiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miro | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| BigTimebigtime.netSee also Transparency alternatives to BigTime | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Niftyniftypm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nifty | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Oraora.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Ora | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Plutioplutio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plutio | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamwork | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stackfield | 52/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Hivehive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hive | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aha!aha.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aha! | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.