Transparency alternatives to monday.com
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at monday.com. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 77 that differ from monday.com on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
monday.com has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at monday.com” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at monday.com | Found at monday.com, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airtable | 91/100 | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartsheet | 91/100 | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Linearlinear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Linear | 70/100 | 4 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Miromiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miro | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Breezebreeze.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Breeze | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| OpenProjectopenproject.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenProject | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| ClickUpclickup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickUp | 58/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stackfield | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Oraora.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Ora | 70/100 | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Plutioplutio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plutio | 70/100 | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Edworkingedworking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Edworking | 57/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamwork | 57/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.