Transparency alternatives to Edworking
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Edworking. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 75 that differ from Edworking on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Edworking has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Edworking” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Edworking | Found at Edworking, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airtable | 91/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartsheet | 91/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| monday.commonday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to monday.com | 74/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Miromiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miro | 70/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamwork | 57/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| BigTimebigtime.netSee also Transparency alternatives to BigTime | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stackfield | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Hivehive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hive | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Basecampbasecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Basecamp | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Linearlinear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Linear | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Asanaasana.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asana | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| MeisterTaskmeistertask.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MeisterTask | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.