SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Lark

Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Lark does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 67 that differ from Lark on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Lark has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Lark does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Lark does notLark publishes, and they do not
Airtableairtable.com 91/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 nothing Compare
Smartsheetsmartsheet.com 91/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 nothing Compare
Miromiro.com 74/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Linearlinear.app 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Oraora.pm 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
monday.commonday.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Teamworkteamwork.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
Breezebreeze.pm 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
OpenProjectopenproject.org 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
BigTimebigtime.net 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Stackfieldstackfield.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Hivehive.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.