SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Gimmal

Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Gimmal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from Gimmal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gimmal has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Gimmal” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at GimmalFound at Gimmal, not found there
Objective ECMobjective.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Objective ECM 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
AvePoint Recordsavepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AvePoint Records 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Collabwarecollabware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Collabware 22/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Synergis Adept 22/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
RecordPointrecordpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RecordPoint 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ricoh Recordsricoh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ricoh Records 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Access Corpaccesscorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Access Corp 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Computhinkcomputhink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Computhink 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cott Systemscottsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cott Systems 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Feithfeith.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Feith 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
PreservationVaultinfopreserve.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PreservationVault 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Square 9square-9.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Square 9 9/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.