SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Gimmal

Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Gimmal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 12 that differ from Gimmal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gimmal has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Gimmal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Gimmal does notGimmal publishes, and they do not
Objective ECMobjective.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Collabwarecollabware.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
AvePoint Recordsavepoint.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Computhinkcomputhink.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ricoh Recordsricoh.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Feithfeith.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Zasiozasio.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Access Corpaccesscorp.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Square 9square-9.com 9/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Filecenterfilecenter.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Konica Dispatcherkonicaminolta.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.