Transparency alternatives to Apollo
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Apollo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from Apollo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Apollo has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Apollo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Apollo | Found at Apollo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixmaxmixmax.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mixmax | 74/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearbit | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PhantomBuster | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Lushalusha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lusha | 74/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ZoomInfo | 73/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hunter | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Showpad | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Snov.iosnov.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Snov.io | 62/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Yeswareyesware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yesware | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Clariclari.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clari | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| lemlistlemlist.comSee also Transparency alternatives to lemlist | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Mindticklemindtickle.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindtickle | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.