Transparency alternatives to PhantomBuster
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at PhantomBuster. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from PhantomBuster on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PhantomBuster has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at PhantomBuster” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at PhantomBuster | Found at PhantomBuster, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lusha | 74/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Mixmaxmixmax.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mixmax | 74/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearbit | 65/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Showpad | 65/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Apollo | 57/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Clariclari.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clari | 43/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hunter | 70/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Instantlyinstantly.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Instantly | 57/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Yeswareyesware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yesware | 57/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Albacrossalbacross.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Albacross | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Revenue.iorevenue.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Revenue.io | 52/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scratchpad | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.