SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PhantomBuster

Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PhantomBuster does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 53 that differ from PhantomBuster on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PhantomBuster has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and PhantomBuster does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PhantomBuster does notPhantomBuster publishes, and they do not
Lushalusha.com 74/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Clearbitclearbit.com 65/100 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Showpadshowpad.com 65/100 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Apolloapollo.io 57/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mixmaxmixmax.com 65/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Snov.iosnov.io 62/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Scratchpadscratchpad.com 61/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Yeswareyesware.com 57/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Albacrossalbacross.com 52/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Instantlyinstantly.ai 52/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Revenue.iorevenue.io 52/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Smartleadsmartlead.ai 52/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.