Transparency alternatives to Hunter
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Hunter does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from Hunter on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Hunter has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Hunter does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Hunter does not | Hunter publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.com | 74/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.com | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.com | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Mindticklemindtickle.com | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.com | 61/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.io | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.com | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Yeswareyesware.com | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Salesloftsalesloft.com | 52/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clariclari.com | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Overloopoverloop.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| TexAutexau.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.