SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SEOmator

Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at SEOmator. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from SEOmator on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SEOmator has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at SEOmator” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SEOmatorFound at SEOmator, not found there
Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI 35/100 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Public pricing Compare
OnCrawloncrawl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl 23/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz 26/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Seobilityseobility.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Seobility 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Keytrendskeytrends.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Keytrends 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
SerpApiserpapi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SerpApi 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
BrightEdgebrightedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BrightEdge 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.