SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Similarweb

Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Similarweb. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Similarweb on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Similarweb has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Similarweb” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SimilarwebFound at Similarweb, not found there
Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing nothing Compare
Floyifloyi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Floyi 35/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI 35/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz 26/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Frasefrase.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Frase 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sistrixsistrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sistrix 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
SerpApiserpapi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SerpApi 13/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
AccuRankeraccuranker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccuRanker 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.