SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Quivo

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Quivo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 78 that differ from Quivo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Quivo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Quivo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Quivo does notQuivo publishes, and they do not
AfterShipaftership.com 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
FourKitesfourkites.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Metapackmetapack.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Bringgbringg.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
EasyPosteasypost.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Easyshipeasyship.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
ShipStationshipstation.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Waybillerwaybiller.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cargobasecargobase.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Elromcoelromco.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Freightosfreightos.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.