Transparency alternatives to Turvo
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Turvo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 81 that differ from Turvo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Turvo has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Turvo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Turvo does not | Turvo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfterShipaftership.com | 83/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Sendcloudsendcloud.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| FourKitesfourkites.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Bringgbringg.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Easyshipeasyship.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Waybillerwaybiller.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Elromcoelromco.com | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Intrisintris.be | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Centirocentiro.com | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Flexportflexport.com | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| parcelLabparcellab.com | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.