Transparency alternatives to Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM | Found at Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expelexpel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Expel | 70/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Huntress | 57/100 | 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Pantherpanther.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Panther | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Ontinueontinue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ontinue | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Gigamongigamon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gigamon | 35/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trend Micro | 35/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blumira | 30/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corelight | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Corocoro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Coro | 30/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Cynetcynet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cynet | 30/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Exabeamexabeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Exabeam | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Anvilogicanvilogic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anvilogic | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.