SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to SEKOIA

Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SEKOIA does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from SEKOIA on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SEKOIA has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SEKOIA does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SEKOIA does notSEKOIA publishes, and they do not
Expelexpel.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 nothing Compare
Huntresshuntress.com 57/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Ontinueontinue.com 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pantherpanther.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Trend Microtrendmicro.com 35/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Gigamongigamon.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Blumirablumira.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Corelightcorelight.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Corocoro.net 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Securonixsecuronix.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
WithSecurewithsecure.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
Cybereasoncybereason.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.