Transparency alternatives to HappyOrNot
Other Surveys and forms vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that HappyOrNot does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from HappyOrNot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
HappyOrNot has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and HappyOrNot does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and HappyOrNot does not | HappyOrNot publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jotformjotform.com | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| SurveySparrowsurveysparrow.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Formbricksformbricks.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Typeformtypeform.com | 45/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Survicatesurvicate.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Refinerrefiner.io | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Wufoowufoo.com | 50/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Formstackformstack.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Qualtricsqualtrics.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| SoSci Surveysoscisurvey.de | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SurveyMonkeysurveymonkey.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cognito Formscognitoforms.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.