Alternatives to Riverside
Other Video conferencing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Riverside does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 22 that differ from Riverside on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Riverside has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Riverside does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Riverside does not | Riverside publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pexippexip.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Dialpaddialpad.com | 55/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| TeamViewer Meetingteamviewer.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Livestormlivestorm.co | 50/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Dailydaily.co | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Elementelement.io | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Zoomzoom.com | 43/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Wirewire.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Alfaviewalfaview.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Wherebywhereby.com | 32/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Sherpanysherpany.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Demiodemio.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.