SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Castos

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Castos. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from Castos on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Castos has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Castos” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at CastosFound at Castos, not found there
Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
api.videoapi.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to api.video 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
JWXjwx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JWX 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Descriptdescript.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Descript 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux 52/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo 43/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast 43/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Cleanvoice 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.