SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PIVOT Systems

Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PIVOT Systems does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from PIVOT Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PIVOT Systems has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and PIVOT Systems does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and PIVOT Systems does notPIVOT Systems publishes, and they do not
Wasteboxwastebox.biz 26/100 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ecoprogecoprog.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Resourcifyresourcify.de 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Sap Wasteprologa.de 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Reclayreclay-group.com 18/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zentekzentek.de 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tegostegos-group.com 9/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Rubiconrubicon.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Landbelllandbell.de 13/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Recycle Track Systemsrts.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
RecycleERPrecycleerp.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zeuszeus-software.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.