Transparency alternatives to Mouseflow
Other Web analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mouseflow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Mouseflow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mouseflow has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Mouseflow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Mouseflow | Found at Mouseflow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contentsquarecontentsquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Contentsquare | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Mixpanelmixpanel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mixpanel | 78/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PostHogposthog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PostHog | 78/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Amplitudeamplitude.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplitude | 74/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| FullStoryfullstory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FullStory | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Umamiumami.isSee also Transparency alternatives to Umami | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fathom Analyticsusefathom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom Analytics | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cabinwithcabin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cabin | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Heapheap.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Heap | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| LogRocketlogrocket.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LogRocket | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Swetrixswetrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swetrix | 61/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rybbitrybbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rybbit | 57/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.