Transparency alternatives to Softr
Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Softr. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Softr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Softr has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Softr” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Softr | Found at Softr, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce | 78/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Hostingerhostinger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hostinger | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Squarespacesquarespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squarespace | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Elementor Hostingelementor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Umsoumso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Umso | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Tildatilda.ccSee also Transparency alternatives to Tilda | 41/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Sitejetsitejet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitejet | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Dudaduda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duda | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Brizy Cloudbrizy.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Brizy Cloud | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.