SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Super

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Super does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Super on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Super has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Super does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Super does notSuper publishes, and they do not
Glideglideapps.com 80/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Hostingerhostinger.com 65/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ghostghost.org 65/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.com 65/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Framerframer.com 60/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Softrsoftr.io 55/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Adaloadalo.com 45/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Data processing agreement Compare
IONOSionos.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Typedreamtypedream.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Sitejetsitejet.io 39/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
WordPress.comwordpress.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Wixwix.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data processing agreement Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.