Transparency alternatives to friendlyway
Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at friendlyway. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from friendlyway on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
friendlyway has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at friendlyway” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at friendlyway | Found at friendlyway, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine | 59/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Joangetjoan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Joan | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sign In Solutionssigninsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Kadencekadence.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kadence | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sign In Appsigninapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In App | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Seattiseatti.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Seatti | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.